Barrett Co. v. Saso
236 A.D. 742
Opinion
Order amending judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the village was not chargeable with interest on the fund due to the principal contractor. (Lien Law, §§ 5, 60;
Added by Laws of 1911, chap. 873, as respectively amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 507, and Laws of 1929, chap. 515.— Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrett Co. v. Saso, 236 A.D. 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
236 A.D. 742 (Barrett Co. v. Saso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rockland Lake Trap Rock Co. v. Village of Port Chester
78 N.E. 1100 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Rockland Lake Trap Rock Co. v. Village of Port Chester
102 A.D. 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Moran v. Mayor
162 A.D. 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)