Barreto v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

38 A.D.3d 359, 830 N.Y.S.2d 897
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 A.D.3d 359 (Barreto v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barreto v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 38 A.D.3d 359, 830 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thomp[360]*360son, Jr., J.), entered on or about March 2, 2006, dismissing the complaint after a jury trial, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered February 7, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the aforementioned order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Although plaintiff and a friendly witness were the only persons to testify at trial, we decline to disturb the verdict reached by the jurors (see Sowell v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 16 AD3d 282 [2005]). Plaintiffs evidence was inconsistent and left key points unexplained. Nor do we find that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence so as to warrant a new trial. Plaintiffs argument that the trial court should have granted his motion in limine to bar evidence of his alcohol consumption is without merit under the circumstances. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
140 A.D.3d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.3d 359, 830 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barreto-v-motor-vehicle-accident-indemnification-corp-nyappdiv-2007.