Barreto v. Longner

253 A.D.2d 835, 678 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9838
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Diego Laroche and Blanca Correa appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated February 17, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Florez v Diaz, 243 AD2d 607; Rosmarin v Lamontanaro, 238 AD2d 567; Puma v Player, 233 AD2d 308). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barreto v. Longner, 253 A.D.2d 835, 678 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 835 (Barreto v. Longner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Lomonaco
256 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)