Barreto v. Goord

251 A.D.2d 926, 673 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7746

This text of 251 A.D.2d 926 (Barreto v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barreto v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 926, 673 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s prison record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the petition is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Henderson
159 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 926, 673 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barreto-v-goord-nyappdiv-1998.