Home/New Jersey Superior Court App Division/Barres v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.

Barres v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.

359 A.2d 501, 141 N.J. Super. 563
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJune 3, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 359 A.2d 501 (Barres v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barres v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 359 A.2d 501, 141 N.J. Super. 563 (N.J. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

141 N.J. Super. 563 (1976)
359 A.2d 501

ANTHONY BARRES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HOLT, RINEHART & WINSTON, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 18, 1976.
Decided June 3, 1976.

*564 Before Judges LYNCH, LARNER and HORN.

Mr. Barry H. Evenchick argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Walder, Steiner, Sondak & Evenchick, attorneys).

Mrs. Jane M. Langseth argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys; Mr. Clyde A. Szuch and Mr. Armen Shahinian, on the brief).

PER CURIAM:

We have examined the competing policy arguments relating to the application of the statute of limitations in libel actions and agree with the trial judge that the single publication rule should be adopted as the law of this State. The judgment for defendant is therefore affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Dwyer, reported at 131 N.J. Super. 371 (Law Div. 1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petro-Lubricant Testing Labs., Inc. v. Adelman
184 A.3d 457 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2018)
JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
164 A.3d 1110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017)
Churchill v. State
876 A.2d 311 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Williams v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.
623 A.2d 234 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
Pelullo v. Patterson
788 F. Supp. 234 (D. New Jersey, 1992)
Palestri v. Monogram Models, Inc.
875 F.2d 66 (Third Circuit, 1989)
No. 88-5542
875 F.2d 66 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Kramer v. Monogram Models, Inc.
700 F. Supp. 1348 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
Schiavone Construction Co. v. Time, Inc.
619 F. Supp. 684 (D. New Jersey, 1985)
Schiavone Construction Co. And Ronald A. Schiavone, Individually v. Time, Inc. Appeal of Schiavone Construction Company and Ronald A. Schiavone
735 F.2d 94 (Third Circuit, 1984)
Prager v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc.
569 F. Supp. 1229 (D. New Jersey, 1983)
Zaccardi v. Becker
440 A.2d 1329 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
Cibenko v. Worth Publishers, Inc.
510 F. Supp. 761 (D. New Jersey, 1981)
Tevis v. Tevis
400 A.2d 1189 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Lawrence v. Bauer Publishing & Printing Ltd.
396 A.2d 569 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Lawrence v. Bauer Publishing & Printing Ltd.
381 A.2d 358 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corporation
555 F.2d 1131 (Third Circuit, 1977)
System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.
555 F.2d 1131 (Third Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 A.2d 501, 141 N.J. Super. 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barres-v-holt-rinehart-winston-inc-njsuperctappdiv-1976.