Barrera v. Florida Parole Commission

987 So. 2d 810, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, 2008 WL 3286102
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 2008·No. No. 1D06-6720·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the circuit court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2005). In his petition, appellant contended that the Florida Parole Commission erroneously revoked his conditional release without finding that his violation was a willful violation of a substantial condition of the conditional release order, see Williams v. Florida Parole Commission, 954 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), and therefore he was entitled to be reinstated to conditional release. We conclude that the circuit court should have treated the petition for writ of mandamus as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, see Rowe v. State, 765 So.2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and thus it was erroneous to deny the petition as time-barred. Martin v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 951 So.2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrera v. Florida Parole Commission, 987 So. 2d 810, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, 2008 WL 3286102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

987 So. 2d 810 (Barrera v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LLEO v. State
41 So. 3d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Pearce v. McNeil
1 So. 3d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)