Barrera (Higinio) v. State
This text of Barrera (Higinio) v. State (Barrera (Higinio) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69428 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69514 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69515 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED FEB 0 1 2016
ALA: ea ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying a motion for rehearing, a motion to stop time to exhaust all claims, and a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1941A oe
elV11: 1MtviVehztra,a7tr€, Wrafe, Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.'
Douglas
CC: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge Higinio Causse Barrera Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
'In light of this order, the pro se motion filed on January 21, 2016, is denied as moot.
M) 1941A e 2 "Sztga SMIMMEISI
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barrera (Higinio) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrera-higinio-v-state-nev-2016.