Barrera (Higinio) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69428 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69514 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69515 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
FILED
FEB 0 1 2016
ALA: ea
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying a motion for rehearing, a motion to stop time to exhaust all claims, and a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1941A oe
elV11: 1MtviVehztra,a7tr€, Wrafe,
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.'
Douglas
CC: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge Higinio Causse Barrera Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
'In light of this order, the pro se motion filed on January 21, 2016, is denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
M) 1941A e 2 "Sztga SMIMMEISI
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrera (Higinio) v. State (Barrera (Higinio) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.