Barrera (Higinio) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 2016·No. 69515·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69428 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69514 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69515 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

FILED

FEB 0 1 2016

ALA: ea

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying a motion for rehearing, a motion to stop time to exhaust all claims, and a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1941A oe

elV11: 1MtviVehztra,a7tr€, Wrafe,

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.'

Douglas

CC: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge Higinio Causse Barrera Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, the pro se motion filed on January 21, 2016, is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

M) 1941A e 2 "Sztga SMIMMEISI

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrera (Higinio) v. State, (Neb. 2016).

Barrera (Higinio) v. State (Barrera (Higinio) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)