Barreau v. Hutchinson

21 N.Y.S. 1128, 2 Misc. 577, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 921
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJanuary 3, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 1128 (Barreau v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barreau v. Hutchinson, 21 N.Y.S. 1128, 2 Misc. 577, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 921 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The vice of appellant’s contention is that it assumes the letter of September 10th, addressed by defendant’s wife to plaintiff, to be an unequivocal and absolute repudiation of the contract of employment, whereas the justice below apparently construed it to have been no more than a proposition that plaintiff consent to a modification of the terms of the contract theretofore made, and as, in our opinion, the letter is susceptible of the latter construction, it necessarily follows that appellant has not sustained the burden of showing error for which the judgment appealed from must be reversed. Motion for reargu’ment denied, with $ 10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.Y.S. 1128, 2 Misc. 577, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barreau-v-hutchinson-nyctcompl-1893.