Barral v. Barral (Child Custody)
This text of Barral v. Barral (Child Custody) (Barral v. Barral (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DUSTIN JAMES BARRAL, No. 84721
vs. Appellant, FR ED MEGAN ELIZABETH BARRAL, N/K/A AUG 0 k 222 MEGAN ELIZABETH HAMMONDS, Res • ondent. FM bUFRE;i.:OURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order resolving appellant's motion to modify child custody, visitation, and support. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Stacy Michelle Rocheleau, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the challenged district court order granted appellant the relief he requested, suspending his support obligation. Further, the challenged order denied respondent's motion to reduce support arrears to judgment. Appellant is not aggrieved by this order. See NRAP 3A(a) (only an aggrieved party may appeal). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
j , J. Stiglich Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(Op 1947A 2-7utti cc: Hon. Stacy Michelle Rocheleau, District Judge, Family Court Division Dustin James Barral Megan Elizabeth Barral Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (IU 1 947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barral v. Barral (Child Custody), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barral-v-barral-child-custody-nev-2022.