Barradas, Ruth

Opinion

RECEIVED IN Oca.2_%2dis- ll titl IV COURT OF ORWAL APPEALS •m'-lb NOV 12 2015 cJISPIM*,. AbelAco^a.Cterk lisa matz -CLERK-5th~DISTRICr _I£ Vvvj^tVv ^S ^-V Va oVoJS v_v^ t-^No*k \\\ o Yes \jf\p^ XS -VmoCqC ^> ^ ^o'^.eb\\o\N:vV^vx io^NJSXS kjtoXxA^J^O^->Cv_

:.0 lU'i'J-

caAV-* , Abel Acbsta, Ciem \*v^= s^_^>«j^ ^jsi^^k d&j^Ji^ $e**5£^J^&r eve \*^> \*c exVvf-^o^dl vj

^CvtV-^osoCsJ^ . ""Wa. S^Cx.'S^gjC S 6cXOv \ \fVC^Q,.g, "^^ Q^UUyS

(\ \CvsjQv\-Pjp 3CyvSJ^1