Barr v. Warden
This text of 90 A.2d 216 (Barr v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BARR
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.
MARKELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an application for leave to appeal from denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence for ten years for violations of the narcotics laws. He alleges that he was twice arrested (the *658 second time while on bail for the first alleged offense) without a warrant by breaking into "an apartment" (not expressly, but inferentially alleged to be his) and not clearly, but perhaps by inference, that evidence was obtained by unconstitutional, unlawful search and seizure. These contentions could all have been made on motion for a new trial or on appeal, but not on habeas corpus. Loughran v. Warden, 192 Md. 719, 64 A.2d 712.
Application denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.2d 216, 200 Md. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-warden-md-2001.