Barr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barr v. State

929 So. 2d 685, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7858, 2006 WL 1359328

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 19, 2006

DocketNo. 5D05-1675

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 685 (Barr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barr v. State, 929 So. 2d 685, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7858, 2006 WL 1359328 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Busby v. State, 894 So.2d 88, 95 (Fla.2004) (stating “[i]t is within a trial court’s province to determine whether a challenge for cause is proper, and a trial court’s determination of juror competency will not be overturned absent manifest error”) (quoting Fernandez v. State, 730 So.2d 277, 281 (Fla.1999)); Johnson v. State, 660 So.2d 637, 644 (Fla.1995) (stating- “[o]n this question [determining juror competency], the trial court is in the best position to observe the attitude and demeanor of the juror and to gauge the quality of the juror’s responses. If there is competent record support for the trial court’s conclusions regarding rehabilitation, the appellate courts of this state will not reverse the determination on appeal based on a cold record”).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

See Busby v. State, 894 So.2d 88, 95 (Fla.2004) (stating “[i]t is within a trial court’s province to determine whether a challenge for cause is proper, and a trial court’s determination of juror competency will not be overturned absent manifest error”) (quoting Fernandez v. State, 730 So.2d 277, 281 (Fla.1999)); Johnson v. State, 660 So.2d 637, 644 (Fla.1995) (stating- “[o]n this question [determining juror competency], the trial court is in the best position to observe the attitude and demeanor of the juror and to gauge the quality of the juror’s responses. If there is competent record support for the trial court’s conclusions regarding rehabilitation, the appellate courts of this state will not reverse the determination on appeal based on a cold record”).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

929 So. 2d 685, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7858, 2006 WL 1359328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack