Barr v. State

970 S.W.2d 243, 333 Ark. 576, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 386
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 11, 1998
DocketCR 98-328
StatusPublished

This text of 970 S.W.2d 243 (Barr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barr v. State, 970 S.W.2d 243, 333 Ark. 576, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 386 (Ark. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Richard Francis Barr was convicted of rape. His counsel, Kenneth Fuchs, filed a notice of appeal on December 5, 1997. An order was entered by the circuit court on December 11, 1997, relieving Mr. Fuchs as Mr. Barr’s counsel. The record was lodged with this Court on March 18, 1998. Mr. Barr’s brief was due April 20, 1998, but it has yet to be filed.

The State has moved to dismiss the appeal for failure of Mr. Barr to file a brief. A response to the motion was filed by Mr. Fuchs who stated that he had been relieved and suggesting that counsel be appointed to handle the appeal of Mr. Barr who is indigent.

We decline to dismiss the appeal. Arkansas R. App. P. — Criminal 16 provides:

Trial Counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court or the Arkansas Supreme Court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause. After the notice of appeal of a judgment of conviction has been filed, the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel. [Emphasis supplied.]

Mr. Fuchs remains the counsel of record in this Court for Mr. Barr. The Clerk will set a briefing schedule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
970 S.W.2d 243, 333 Ark. 576, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-state-ark-1998.