Barr v. Sprint Corp.

163 S.W.3d 452, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, 2005 WL 525134
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2005·No. WD 61739·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffery Yarmak appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the Law Office of Herbert Hafif and the Law Office of George A. Barton, P.C. on the law firms’ motion to enforce an attorney’s lien. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barr v. Sprint Corp., 163 S.W.3d 452, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, 2005 WL 525134 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

163 S.W.3d 452 (Barr v. Sprint Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.