Barr v. Snohomish Cnty. Sheriff

428 P.3d 1171, 191 Wash. 2d 1019
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 31, 2018
DocketNo. 96072-1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 428 P.3d 1171 (Barr v. Snohomish Cnty. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barr v. Snohomish Cnty. Sheriff, 428 P.3d 1171, 191 Wash. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018).

Opinion

¶ 1Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud (Justice González sat for Justice Wiggins), considered at its October 30, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cai Hunter Mcintosh, V. State Of Washington
544 P.3d 559 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2024)
Barr v. Snohomish County Sheriff
440 P.3d 131 (Washington Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
428 P.3d 1171, 191 Wash. 2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-snohomish-cnty-sheriff-wash-2018.