Barr v. Lexington County School District Three

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1419

JOSEPH LEE BARR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEXINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT THREE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cv-01351-JFA-PJG)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 20, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Lee Barr, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Duff, Bryn Colette Sarvis, Breon C.M. Walker, DUFF, WHITE & TURNER, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Lee Barr appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Barr’s

claims of racial discrimination, retaliation, breach of

contract, and negligence. With respect to Barr’s latter three

claims, Barr has failed to challenge on appeal the court’s basis

for granting summary judgment for the Appellee. We therefore

find that Barr has forfeited appellate review of those claims.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). With respect to Barr’s claim of racial

discrimination, we have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Barr v. Lexington County Sch. Dist., No.

3:07-cv-01351-JFA-PJG (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED