Barr v. Jackson County
This text of 232 S.E.2d 923 (Barr v. Jackson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. W. Barr and other taxpayers appeal from the dismissal of their equitable action against Jackson County, members of the Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues, and tax officials.
The first two counts of the complaint alleged a lack of uniformity of tax .assessments, and the unconstitutionality of certain tax laws. Declaratory and injunctive relief was sought.
The third count alleged that the detailed actions of the county commissioners in administering the tax laws in the county constituted malpractice in office, and it was prayed that the commissioners be removed from office.
1. The trial judge correctly held that the appellants had an adequate remedy at law as to the allegations of the first two counts of the complaint, and that they were not entitled to relief in a court of equity. Tax Assessors v. Chitwood, 235 Ga. 147 (218 SE2d 759) (1975); Butts County v. Briscoe, 236 Ga. 233 (223 SE2d 199) (1976); Chilivis v. Kell, 236 Ga. 226 (223 SE2d 117) (1976).
2. The appellees have suggested that the issue is moot as to whether an equitable action would lie to remove the members of the Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues named as defendants in the complaint for alleged malpractice in office, since these commissioners are no longer in office. The appellants have, in effect, admitted that these commissioners are no longer in office. The issue raised by the third count is therefore moot.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 S.E.2d 923, 238 Ga. 332, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-jackson-county-ga-1977.