Barr v. Hill

1 Add. 276
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County·Decided September 15, 1795·Published

Opinion

President.

The contract is valid, the consideration good, and the conduct of the defendant faithless and immoral. You will consider his declarations as explanatory of his contract made with Barr. Damages ought to be such as may compel a specific execution of the agreement.

Verdict for the plaintiff, 150l.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barr v. Hill, 1 Add. 276 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1795).

1 Add. 276 (Barr v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.