Barr v. Geldziler

156 A. 644, 108 N.J.L. 397
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 19, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 A. 644 (Barr v. Geldziler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barr v. Geldziler, 156 A. 644, 108 N.J.L. 397 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgments appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge Porter.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Parker, Donges, Kays, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Labarthe v. McRae
97 P.2d 251 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Turner v. Passaic Pension Commission
163 A. 282 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A. 644, 108 N.J.L. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-geldziler-nj-1931.