Barr v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

ALEX BARR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV417-203 ) NICHOLAS SILBERG, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER The parties were previously directed to hold a Rule 26(f) conference within fourteen days from the filing of defendant’s answer, and to file a Rule 26(f) Report within seven days of that conference. Doc. 19. To this date, no such report has been filed with the Court. The parties are DIRECTED to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. See L.R. 41(b); see Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (courts have the inherent authority to dismiss claims for lack of prosecution); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Floyd v. United States, CV491-277 (S.D. Ga. June 10, 1992). SO ORDERED, this 29th day of October, 2019.

Vota pr CHRISTOPHER L. RAY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA