Barr & Shoulberg v. Yellow Taxi Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Barr & Shoulberg v. Yellow Taxi Corp.

152 Misc. 293, 273 N.Y.S. 754, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1836

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 152 Misc. 293 (Barr & Shoulberg v. Yellow Taxi Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barr & Shoulberg v. Yellow Taxi Corp., 152 Misc. 293, 273 N.Y.S. 754, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While we do not think that the ordinance has any bearing on the case we consider that there was no error in ordering a new trial. Defendants, having received the goods from plaintiff and having without authority delivered them to a stranger, were liable as matter of law.

Order affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to respondent to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

While we do not think that the ordinance has any bearing on the case we consider that there was no error in ordering a new trial. Defendants, having received the goods from plaintiff and having without authority delivered them to a stranger, were liable as matter of law.

Order affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to respondent to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 Misc. 293, 273 N.Y.S. 754, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-shoulberg-v-yellow-taxi-corp-nyappterm-1933.