Baron's of Nyack, Inc. v. Yacopino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baron's of Nyack, Inc. v. Yacopino

47 A.D.2d 944, 367 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9414

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 944 (Baron's of Nyack, Inc. v. Yacopino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baron's of Nyack, Inc. v. Yacopino, 47 A.D.2d 944, 367 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review certain assessments upon real property, the appeal is from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered June 10, 1974 and June 14, 1974, respectively, which, inter alla, reduced the assessment on petitioner’s property and confirmed the referee’s report. Appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements. A judgment made on default is not reviewable (CPLR 5511; Bishop v Gilmore, 30 AD2d 696). However, we have examined the record and have considered appellant’s contentions. If we were not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm the judgments. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review certain assessments upon real property, the appeal is from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered June 10, 1974 and June 14, 1974, respectively, which, inter alla, reduced the assessment on petitioner’s property and confirmed the referee’s report. Appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements. A judgment made on default is not reviewable (CPLR 5511; Bishop v Gilmore, 30 AD2d 696). However, we have examined the record and have considered appellant’s contentions. If we were not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm the judgments. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 944, 367 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barons-of-nyack-inc-v-yacopino-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack