Barone v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barone v. City of Buffalo

134 A.D.2d 948

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1987

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 948 (Barone v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barone v. City of Buffalo, 134 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court correctly determined that plaintiff had no right to the relief requested in his complaint. We modify the order, however, by deleting the paragraph granting defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, and substituting the provision declaring that "the Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency has the right to require that either plaintiff pay rent of $6,000 per month or vacate the premises” (see, Holliswood Care Center v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004; Powers v General Acc. Ins. Co., 109 AD2d 830).

Plaintiff’s appeal from the order directing an evidentiary hearing must be dismissed since there is no appeal as of right from such an order (see, Howell v Independent Union, 112 AD2d 754). The order is otherwise affirmed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — stay.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court correctly determined that plaintiff had no right to the relief requested in his complaint. We modify the order, however, by deleting the paragraph granting defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, and substituting the provision declaring that "the Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency has the right to require that either plaintiff pay rent of $6,000 per month or vacate the premises” (see, Holliswood Care Center v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004; Powers v General Acc. Ins. Co., 109 AD2d 830).

Plaintiff’s appeal from the order directing an evidentiary hearing must be dismissed since there is no appeal as of right from such an order (see, Howell v Independent Union, 112 AD2d 754). The order is otherwise affirmed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — stay.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barone-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack