Barone v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barone v. Adams

20 A.D.2d 790, 248 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4269

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 790 (Barone v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barone v. Adams, 20 A.D.2d 790, 248 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the former Civil Practice Act, to annul a determination of the president and faculty of Hofstra College, not to continue the petitioner as a lecturer, the college and its said officials appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 2, 1963, which (a) denied their motion to dismiss the petition; and (b) directed them to “afford petitioner a hearing in accordance with the statutes of Hofstra College ”. The appeal was taken pursuant to the permission granted by order of the court, dated September 12, 1963. Order reversed on the law, without costs; motion to dismiss the petition granted, and petition dismissed in toto, without costs. No charges were presented against petitioner; she was not dismissed. She was concurrently serving as teacher in the New York City Public School System, and she may have had tenure in that system. Her compensation from Hofstra College, however, was merely additional compensation earned as lecturer, pursuant to contract, and without tenure. Upon termination of the contract the college officials did not offer to renew the contract. As they were entirely within their rights in so doing and as she had no tenure at Hofstra, a hearing with respect to their determination was unavailable to her. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur. [39 Misc 2d 227.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the former Civil Practice Act, to annul a determination of the president and faculty of Hofstra College, not to continue the petitioner as a lecturer, the college and its said officials appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 2, 1963, which (a) denied their motion to dismiss the petition; and (b) directed them to “afford petitioner a hearing in accordance with the statutes of Hofstra College ”. The appeal was taken pursuant to the permission granted by order of the court, dated September 12, 1963. Order reversed on the law, without costs; motion to dismiss the petition granted, and petition dismissed in toto, without costs. No charges were presented against petitioner; she was not dismissed. She was concurrently serving as teacher in the New York City Public School System, and she may have had tenure in that system. Her compensation from Hofstra College, however, was merely additional compensation earned as lecturer, pursuant to contract, and without tenure. Upon termination of the contract the college officials did not offer to renew the contract. As they were entirely within their rights in so doing and as she had no tenure at Hofstra, a hearing with respect to their determination was unavailable to her. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur. [39 Misc 2d 227.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 790, 248 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barone-v-adams-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack