Baron v. State

865 So. 2d 689, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 2004 WL 314461
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-1519
StatusPublished

This text of 865 So. 2d 689 (Baron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baron v. State, 865 So. 2d 689, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 2004 WL 314461 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Jordan, 630 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (“A defendant who knowingly accepts the benefit of a plea bargain cannot thereafter disavow that bargain, any more than a party to a contract can accept the benefit of that contract and then refuse to perform his obligations thereunder”); Scott v. State, 465 So.2d 1359, 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (“[A defendant] is not entitled to negotiate a plea, accept the benefit of it, and then ask the trial court, or this court, to grant him a better deal than the one agreed to by the state”).

THOMPSON, PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jordan
630 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Scott v. State
465 So. 2d 1359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 So. 2d 689, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 2004 WL 314461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baron-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.