Baron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baron v. State

865 So. 2d 689, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 2004 WL 314461

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2004·No. No. 5D03-1519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Jordan, 630 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (“A defendant who knowingly accepts the benefit of a plea bargain cannot thereafter disavow that bargain, any more than a party to a contract can accept the benefit of that contract and then refuse to perform his obligations thereunder”); Scott v. State, 465 So.2d 1359, 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (“[A defendant] is not entitled to negotiate a plea, accept the benefit of it, and then ask the trial court, or this court, to grant him a better deal than the one agreed to by the state”).

THOMPSON, PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Jordan, 630 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (“A defendant who knowingly accepts the benefit of a plea bargain cannot thereafter disavow that bargain, any more than a party to a contract can accept the benefit of that contract and then refuse to perform his obligations thereunder”); Scott v. State, 465 So.2d 1359, 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (“[A defendant] is not entitled to negotiate a plea, accept the benefit of it, and then ask the trial court, or this court, to grant him a better deal than the one agreed to by the state”).

THOMPSON, PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Baron v. State, 865 So. 2d 689, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 2004 WL 314461 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

865 So. 2d 689 (Baron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related