Baron v. Baron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baron v. Baron

20 A.D.2d 770, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 770 (Baron v. Baron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baron v. Baron, 20 A.D.2d 770, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered October 15, 1963, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not sufficiently state a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. The determination is, of course, without prejudice to plaintiff pleading in any other action, if he can, a proper cause of action which alleges ultimate facts that the Mexican judgment and the separation agreement were invalid, by reason of duress or otherwise. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered October 15, 1963, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not sufficiently state a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. The determination is, of course, without prejudice to plaintiff pleading in any other action, if he can, a proper cause of action which alleges ultimate facts that the Mexican judgment and the separation agreement were invalid, by reason of duress or otherwise. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 770, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baron-v-baron-nyappdiv-1964.