Baron Transport v. Riley

526 So. 2d 1028, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1425, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2636, 1988 WL 62116
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1988
DocketNos. BT-185 & BT-187
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 526 So. 2d 1028 (Baron Transport v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baron Transport v. Riley, 526 So. 2d 1028, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1425, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2636, 1988 WL 62116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

The employer/carrier (e/c) in this consolidated workers’ compensation appeal contend that the deputy commissioner erred in awarding the claimant’s attorney a $5,200 fee and in awarding the claimant temporary total disability (TTD) benefits. We affirm the TTD award without further discussion. As to the fee award, we find the order deficient and reverse.

The order purports to award the fee for services rendered by claimant’s attorney in procuring TTD benefits and certain remedial medical treatment. However, the basis of the award, the e/c’s bad faith, has never been determined as to TTD benefits. The order awarding TTD benefits, entered on the same day as the order awarding the attorney’s fee, specifically provides that the responsibility for and the amount of claimant’s attorney’s fee will be determined at a subsequent hearing. Moreover, the fee order does not state the dollar amount of benefits obtained for which it had been determined in a previous order that the e/c acted in bad faith. Nor does the order adequately address all the statutory factors. In such a case, the order should be reversed and the cause remanded because meaningful review is impossible. School Board of Collier County v. Salter, 457 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Porter, 452 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services/Division of Blind Services v. Bean, 435 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

[1029]*1029The order awarding attorney’s fees is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings. The order awarding TTD benefits is AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HRS District I v. Bedford
767 So. 2d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Shop & Go, Inc. v. Copeland
549 So. 2d 803 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 1028, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1425, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2636, 1988 WL 62116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baron-transport-v-riley-fladistctapp-1988.