Barnum v. State
22 So. 3d 151, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18187, 2009 WL 4117417
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2009·No. No. 1D08-3122·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no substantive error in the order revoking the appellant’s probation but remand the case to the trial court to enter a corrected order showing that the judgment was rendered on the evidence presented in a probation violation hearing and not by an admission.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnum v. State, 22 So. 3d 151, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18187, 2009 WL 4117417 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
22 So. 3d 151 (Barnum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aviles v. State
22 So. 3d 151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)