Barnum v. Rome
270 A.D. 853, 61 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In an action to restrain defendants from violating a zoning ordinance and for other relief, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer [854]*854within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnum v. Rome, 270 A.D. 853, 61 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).
270 A.D. 853 (Barnum v. Rome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of New York v. New York Jets Football Club, Inc.
90 Misc. 2d 311 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)