Barnum v. Rome
This text of 270 A.D. 853 (Barnum v. Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to restrain defendants from violating a zoning ordinance and for other relief, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer [854]*854within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 853, 61 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnum-v-rome-nyappdiv-1946.