Barnum v. Rome

270 A.D. 853, 61 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 853 (Barnum v. Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnum v. Rome, 270 A.D. 853, 61 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

In an action to restrain defendants from violating a zoning ordinance and for other relief, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer [854]*854within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of New York v. New York Jets Football Club, Inc.
90 Misc. 2d 311 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D. 853, 61 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnum-v-rome-nyappdiv-1946.