Barns v. Webb

1 Tyl. 17
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We do not wish to hear the counsel for the plaintiff. The authorities are clear and full upon • this point. They arc founded in reason, and [20]*20ought not to be departed from. The evidence of the truth of the words proved to have been spoken by the defendant cannot be admitted under the general issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barns v. Webb, 1 Tyl. 17 (Vt. 1801).

1 Tyl. 17 (Barns v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bodwell v. Swan
20 Mass. 376 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)