Barnishin v. State

864 So. 2d 1236, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 648, 2004 WL 221193
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 2004·No. No. 1D02-0741·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Williams v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 760 So.2d 959, 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“[T]he expedient course of action at this time would be for Williams to refile his petition ... in the circuit court which presently has jurisdiction.”).

BOOTH, BENTON, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnishin v. State, 864 So. 2d 1236, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 648, 2004 WL 221193 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

864 So. 2d 1236 (Barnishin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rowl v. Rowl
864 So. 2d 1236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)