Barnish v. KWI Building Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Barnish v. KWI Building Co.

946 A.2d 639, 596 Pa. 499, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 383

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barnish v. KWI Building Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 602 Pa. 402 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 3, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the grant of summary judgment to Respondent? The parties are directed to address the effect of the continued successful use of a product on a plaintiff’s ability to withstand summary judgment under the malfunction theory of strict product liability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the grant of summary judgment to Respondent? The parties are directed to address the effect of the continued successful use of a product on a plaintiff’s ability to withstand summary judgment under the malfunction theory of strict product liability.

Barnish v. KWI Building Co., 946 A.2d 639, 596 Pa. 499, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 383 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

946 A.2d 639 (Barnish v. KWI Building Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.