Barnhill v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Barnhill v. State

388 S.W.2d 99, 239 Ark. 168, 1965 Ark. LEXIS 948

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 15, 1965

Docket5112

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 388 S.W.2d 99 (Barnhill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnhill v. State, 388 S.W.2d 99, 239 Ark. 168, 1965 Ark. LEXIS 948 (Ark. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for involuntary manslaughter. Appellant Roy C. Barnhill was charged by information in Clay Circuit Court, Western District, with the crime of involuntary manslaughter following an automobile collision which resulted in a death on April 29, 1963. After trial on January 21 and 22, 1964, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of involuntary manslaughter and fixed the punishment at three years in the penitentiary. From judgment on the verdict comes this appeal.

Appellant filed no motion for new trial. In the absence of a motion for new trial, this court will only determine whether there is error on the face of the record. Howell v. State, 180 Ark. 241, 22 S. W. 2d 47; Whelehon and Pepper v. State, 233 Ark. 229, 343 S. W. 2d 563. We have examined the record and find no error apparent on the face of-the record. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for involuntary manslaughter. Appellant Roy C. Barnhill was charged by information in Clay Circuit Court, Western District, with the crime of involuntary manslaughter following an automobile collision which resulted in a death on April 29, 1963. After trial on January 21 and 22, 1964, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of involuntary manslaughter and fixed the punishment at three years in the penitentiary. From judgment on the verdict comes this appeal.

Appellant filed no motion for new trial. In the absence of a motion for new trial, this court will only determine whether there is error on the face of the record. Howell v. State, 180 Ark. 241, 22 S. W. 2d 47; Whelehon and Pepper v. State, 233 Ark. 229, 343 S. W. 2d 563. We have examined the record and find no error apparent on the face of-the record. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

388 S.W.2d 99, 239 Ark. 168, 1965 Ark. LEXIS 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnhill-v-state-ark-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack