Barnhill v. Bradberry
This text of Barnhill v. Bradberry (Barnhill v. Bradberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-10889 Document: 00516258803 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED March 29, 2022 No. 20-10889 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
Cody Everett Barnhill,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Pepper Bradberry,
Defendant—Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CV-159
Before Southwick, Graves, and Costa, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Cody Everett Barnhill, Texas prisoner # 1948527, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the denial of various orders entered in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We lack appellate jurisdiction because the orders denying motions for appointment of counsel and for production of documents and a video are not appealable interlocutory orders.
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-10889 Document: 00516258803 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
No. 20-10889
See Williams v. Catoe, 946 F.3d 278, 279 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc); Texaco Inc. v. Louisiana Land & Expl. Co., 995 F.2d 43, 44 (5th Cir. 1993). The IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barnhill v. Bradberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnhill-v-bradberry-ca5-2022.