Barnhart, L. v. Wingard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 23, 2017·No. Barnhart, L. v. Wingard - No. 46 WM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

LEELAND BARNHART, : No. 46 WM 2017 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

SUPERINTENDANT [SIC] WINGARD : (S.C.I. SOMERSET): PENNSYLVANIA : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE: : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : (A.D.A. BRIANA VANATA), :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is

improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnhart, L. v. Wingard, (Pa. 2017).

Barnhart, L. v. Wingard (Barnhart, L. v. Wingard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)