Barnhart, L. v. Wingard
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
LEELAND BARNHART, : No. 46 WM 2017 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
SUPERINTENDANT [SIC] WINGARD : (S.C.I. SOMERSET): PENNSYLVANIA : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE: : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : (A.D.A. BRIANA VANATA), :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is
improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnhart, L. v. Wingard (Barnhart, L. v. Wingard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.