Barnhart, L. v. Wingard
This text of Barnhart, L. v. Wingard (Barnhart, L. v. Wingard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
LEELAND BARNHART, : No. 46 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERINTENDANT [SIC] WINGARD : (S.C.I. SOMERSET): PENNSYLVANIA : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE: : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : (A.D.A. BRIANA VANATA), : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is
improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barnhart, L. v. Wingard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnhart-l-v-wingard-pa-2017.