Barnhart Development v. C.F. Sign Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barnhart Development v. C.F. Sign Co.

204 S.W.3d 326, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 2006 WL 3007747

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 2006·No. No. ED 87091·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Barnhart Development Corp. (BDC) appeals the judgment of the Jefferson County Circuit Court quieting title in favor of C.F. Sign Co. (C.F. Sign) and Clayton Francois. The trial court did not erroneously declare or apply the law in not finding that C.F. Sign had to perform deed obligations only after the deed execution. Further, the County granted C.F. Sign the right to use the sign. C.F. Sign also did not have to record its deed.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Barnhart Development Corp. (BDC) appeals the judgment of the Jefferson County Circuit Court quieting title in favor of C.F. Sign Co. (C.F. Sign) and Clayton Francois. The trial court did not erroneously declare or apply the law in not finding that C.F. Sign had to perform deed obligations only after the deed execution. Further, the County granted C.F. Sign the right to use the sign. C.F. Sign also did not have to record its deed.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Barnhart Development v. C.F. Sign Co., 204 S.W.3d 326, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 2006 WL 3007747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 326 (Barnhart Development v. C.F. Sign Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.