Barney-Yeboah v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

29 N.E.3d 896, 25 N.Y.3d 945, 6 N.Y.S.3d 549
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 2015·Published·Cited by 243 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, Supreme Court’s order reinstated, and the certified question answered in the negative. This is not the type of rare case in which the circumstantial proof presented by plaintiff “is so convincing and the defendant’s response so weak that the inference of defendant’s negligence is inescapable” (Morejon v Rais Constr. Co., 7 NY3d 203, 209 [2006]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Rivera, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey concur; Judge Pigott dissents and votes to affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (120 AD3d 1023 [2014]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated, and certified question answered in the negative, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barney-Yeboah v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 29 N.E.3d 896, 25 N.Y.3d 945, 6 N.Y.S.3d 549 (N.Y. 2015).

29 N.E.3d 896 (Barney-Yeboah v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hafeez v. TT of Freeport
2025 NY Slip Op 02327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Maroonick v. Rae Realty, LLC
2022 NY Slip Op 02952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Cantey v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 3213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)