Barney v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co.

148 A. 917, 106 N.J.L. 231, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barney v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 N.J.L. 274
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 3, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barney v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co., 148 A. 917, 106 N.J.L. 231, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 173 (N.J. 1930).

148 A. 917 (Barney v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.