Barnette v. State

205 So. 3d 865, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17708
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2016·No. Nos. 4D16-3049, 4D16-3052·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a timely motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the voluntariness of his plea agreement in lower tribunal case numbers 12-9122CF10A and 14-16661CF10A in light of his claim that he was not awarded the proper amount of jail credit as part of the agreement. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1052 (Fla.2011); Colon v. State, 132 So.3d 297, 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lacy v. State, 117 So.3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Villar v. State, 110 So.3d 503, 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Affirmed without prejudice.

CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnette v. State, 205 So. 3d 865, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17708 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

205 So. 3d 865 (Barnette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RICHARD TUMMINIA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Terrence Eugene Ancrum v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
DOMENIC BRIAN SANTEUFEMIO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019