Barnette v. State
This text of 205 So. 3d 865 (Barnette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a timely motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the voluntariness of his plea agreement in lower tribunal case numbers 12-9122CF10A and 14-16661CF10A in light of his claim that he was not awarded the proper amount of jail credit as part of the agreement. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1052 (Fla.2011); Colon v. State, 132 So.3d 297, 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lacy v. State, 117 So.3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Villar v. State, 110 So.3d 503, 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Affirmed without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 So. 3d 865, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnette-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.