Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation
This text of Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation (Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel's motion for anen banc investigation is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon plaintiff's counsel's motion for a continuance and with defendants' consent, and for good cause shown, the above-captioned case shall be and is CONTINUED from the December 15, 1994 Full Commission hearing docket. This case shall be scheduled at the next available regular session of Full Commission hearings, regardless of the composition of the Full Commission.
This the ____________ day of ___________________, 1994.
FOR THE FULL COMMISSION
S/ ___________________ JAMES J. BOOKER COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ ___________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
S/ ___________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnette-v-s-m-equipment-corporation-ncworkcompcom-1994.