Home/North Carolina Industrial Commission/Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation

Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided December 19, 1994·No. I.C. No. 068953·Published

Opinion

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel's motion for anen banc investigation is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon plaintiff's counsel's motion for a continuance and with defendants' consent, and for good cause shown, the above-captioned case shall be and is CONTINUED from the December 15, 1994 Full Commission hearing docket. This case shall be scheduled at the next available regular session of Full Commission hearings, regardless of the composition of the Full Commission.

This the ____________ day of ___________________, 1994.

FOR THE FULL COMMISSION

S/ ___________________ JAMES J. BOOKER COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ ___________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

S/ ___________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1994).

Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation (Barnette v. S M Equipment Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.