Barnett v. Woodruff

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barnett v. Woodruff

252 S.E.2d 82, 148 Ga. App. 657, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1593

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 9, 1979

Docket56981

StatusPublished

This text of 252 S.E.2d 82 (Barnett v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnett v. Woodruff, 252 S.E.2d 82, 148 Ga. App. 657, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs-tenants filed this suit against their defendant-landlord for breach of quiet enjoyment, trespass, and wrongful eviction. Plaintiffs prayed for general and punitive damages and a trial by jury, as well [658]*658as a restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunctions. The superior court issued a temporary restraining order and set a date to hear the motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs failed to appear at this pre-trial hearing and the court granted defendant’s motions to dissolve the restraining order and to dismiss the entire complaint. Plaintiffs appeal from this judgment. Held:

Submitted January 3, 1979 Decided January 9, 1979. David Friedman, for appellants. Harvey J. Kennedy, Jr., Ham, Mills & Freeman, W. Franklin Freeman, Jr., for appellee.

Plaintiffs failed to prosecute the equitable claim; the restraining order was properly dissolved, and plaintiffs do not challenge that part of the judgment. However, the complaint also sought ex delicto damages which required jury consideration, and which were not to be decided at the pre-trial hearings on the preliminary injunction. Therefore, this part of the case could not be dismissed along with the claim for equitable relief for lack of prosecution. Nix v. Nix, 138 Ga. App. 754 (227 SE2d 481).

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs-tenants filed this suit against their defendant-landlord for breach of quiet enjoyment, trespass, and wrongful eviction. Plaintiffs prayed for general and punitive damages and a trial by jury, as well [658]*658as a restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunctions. The superior court issued a temporary restraining order and set a date to hear the motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs failed to appear at this pre-trial hearing and the court granted defendant’s motions to dissolve the restraining order and to dismiss the entire complaint. Plaintiffs appeal from this judgment. Held:

Submitted January 3, 1979 Decided January 9, 1979. David Friedman, for appellants. Harvey J. Kennedy, Jr., Ham, Mills & Freeman, W. Franklin Freeman, Jr., for appellee.

Plaintiffs failed to prosecute the equitable claim; the restraining order was properly dissolved, and plaintiffs do not challenge that part of the judgment. However, the complaint also sought ex delicto damages which required jury consideration, and which were not to be decided at the pre-trial hearings on the preliminary injunction. Therefore, this part of the case could not be dismissed along with the claim for equitable relief for lack of prosecution. Nix v. Nix, 138 Ga. App. 754 (227 SE2d 481).

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Banke, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 S.E.2d 82, 148 Ga. App. 657, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-woodruff-gactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack