Barnett v. Weaver
2 Whart. 418, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 192
Opinion
,We discover no material difference betwixt this case and Shewell v. Keen, decided here the last term. The property attached in the hands of the garnishees, was assets in their hands as executors, and entitled them to demand refunding bonds. It was therefore not a subject of attachment.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Weaver, 2 Whart. 418, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 192 (Pa. 1837).
2 Whart. 418 (Barnett v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merritt Lumber Co. v. Erney
67 Pa. D. & C. 30 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1948)