Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General

Fourth Circuit

Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General

537 F. App'x 281

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 13, 2013·No. No. 13-1604·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Earl Barnett appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge as modified and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and dismissing Barnett’s employment discrimination action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 1:11-cv00203-IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 1164355 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense [282] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Earl Barnett appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge as modified and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and dismissing Barnett’s employment discrimination action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 1:11-cv00203-IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 1164355 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense [282] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General, 537 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

537 F. App'x 281 (Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.