Barnett v. United States

107 F.2d 1008, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2882
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1939
DocketNo. 8449
StatusPublished

This text of 107 F.2d 1008 (Barnett v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. United States, 107 F.2d 1008, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2882 (6th Cir. 1939).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Came John T. Metcalf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky, and moved the Court to docket and dismiss the appeal in this case, for the reason that'the appellants have not perfected same, and the parties having indicated, by counsel, that they desire to take no further steps in the appeal of this case, and the Court being advised;

It is ordered and adjudged that this case be and the same is hereby docketed and dismissed at the cost of the appellants, Es-till Barnett, Taylor Barnett, Donald Strong, French Combs, M. C. Noble, R. B. Barnett, W. J. Turner, Thomas Haddix, F. M. Miller and Farris Hays.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 F.2d 1008, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-united-states-ca6-1939.