Barnett v. State
34 Ala. 260
This text of 34 Ala. 260 (Barnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barnett v. State, 34 Ala. 260 (Ala. 1859).
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
The appeal in this case must be dismissed. The bond is a security for such costs only as the appellee may sustain. If the judgment should be affirmed, the appellee certainly does not sustain all the costs. Therefore, in the event of an affirmance, there is no security for all the costs. — Hinson v. Preslor, 27 Ala. 643; Walker v. Hunter, at the last term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hinson v. Preslor
27 Ala. 643 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1855)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Ala. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-state-ala-1859.