Barnett v. State
34 Ala. 260
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
The appeal in this case must be dismissed. The bond is a security for such costs only as the appellee may sustain. If the judgment should be affirmed, the appellee certainly does not sustain all the costs. Therefore, in the event of an affirmance, there is no security for all the costs. — Hinson v. Preslor, 27 Ala. 643; Walker v. Hunter, at the last term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. State, 34 Ala. 260 (Ala. 1859).
34 Ala. 260 (Barnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hinson v. Preslor
27 Ala. 643 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1855)