Barnett v. State

15 Ala. 829
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 Ala. 829 (Barnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. State, 15 Ala. 829 (Ala. 1849).

Opinion

CHILTON, J.

The precise points raised by the record before us, viz., whether the proceedings of the court of roads and revenue could be revised upon certiorari, upon the application.of a party injured thereby, as also, whether it was necessary for the record affirmatively to show, that the notice required to be given by the statute (Clay’s Dig. 507, § 3) had been given, were decided by this court at the last term, in the case of the Commissioners of Roads and Revenue v. Thompson, and ruled adversely to the plaintiffs in error.

We have re-examined that case, as well as the authorities referred to by the counsel for the plaintiff-in error in this, and have come to the conclusion, that the principles of law are there correctly laid down. The case before us, must be affirmed, upon authority of that... Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Potts v. Court of Commissioners
82 So. 550 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Board of Revenue v. Merrill
69 So. 971 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Ala. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-state-ala-1849.