Barnett v. Stanton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Barnett v. Stanton

205 Ill. App. 382

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 18, 1917·No. Gen. No. 21,892·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and ebrob—when discussion of evidence is harmless error. Discussion in the presence of the jury with reference to the admission of certain evidence which was properly excluded, held not to he prejudicial. 5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 4*—when judge of County Court may preside. Under the Municipal Court Act, the judge of a County Court may preside in the Municipal Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and ebrob—when discussion of evidence is harmless error. Discussion in the presence of the jury with reference to the admission of certain evidence which was properly excluded, held not to he prejudicial. 5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 4*—when judge of County Court may preside. Under the Municipal Court Act, the judge of a County Court may preside in the Municipal Court.

Barnett v. Stanton, 205 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

205 Ill. App. 382 (Barnett v. Stanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.