Barnett v. Stanton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Barnett v. Stanton

205 Ill. App. 382

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 18, 1917

DocketGen. No. 21,892

StatusPublished

This text of 205 Ill. App. 382 (Barnett v. Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnett v. Stanton, 205 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and ebrob—when discussion of evidence is harmless error. Discussion in the presence of the jury with reference to the admission of certain evidence which was properly excluded, held not to he prejudicial. 5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 4*—when judge of County Court may preside. Under the Municipal Court Act, the judge of a County Court may preside in the Municipal Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and ebrob—when discussion of evidence is harmless error. Discussion in the presence of the jury with reference to the admission of certain evidence which was properly excluded, held not to he prejudicial. 5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 4*—when judge of County Court may preside. Under the Municipal Court Act, the judge of a County Court may preside in the Municipal Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 Ill. App. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-stanton-illappct-1917.