Barnett v. Spencer

2 Va. 7
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided September 15, 1807·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is not like the case of Davenport v. Mason, 2 Wash. 200. The decree in that case was made in the regular course of the docket, upon the final hearing of the cause ; but, in this case, it was only a motion to dissolve ; and costs were improperly decreed. So much of the decree, therefore, as relates to the costs, must be reversed with costs, and the cause remitted to the county court, to be proceeded in to a final decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. Spencer, 2 Va. 7 (Va. 1807).

2 Va. 7 (Barnett v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n
26 P. 252 (Washington Supreme Court, 1891)