Barnett v. Ross
3 A.2d 923, 333 Pa. 510, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 754
Opinion
The statement of claim in this case was clearly insufficient. The judgment of non pros, is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Bok in the court below. ;
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Ross, 3 A.2d 923, 333 Pa. 510, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 754 (Pa. 1939).
3 A.2d 923 (Barnett v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nagele v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.
193 F.R.D. 94 (W.D. New York, 2000)
Alexander v. Alexander
561 S.W.2d 59 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1978)
Local No. 163, International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers v. Watkins
207 A.2d 776 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Layman v. Jenkins
76 Pa. D. & C. 533 (Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)