Barnett v. Rogers

Supreme Court

Barnett v. Rogers

302 U.S. 655, 58 S. Ct. 363

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 13, 1937

DocketNo. 569

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 302 U.S. 655 (Barnett v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnett v. Rogers, 302 U.S. 655, 58 S. Ct. 363 (1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Brooks v. Missouri, 124 U. S. 394, 400; John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Nevada-California-Oregon Ry. v. Burres, 244 U. S. 103, 105; Central Union Co. v. Edwardsville, 269 U. S. 190, 195; Kammerer v. Kroeger, 299 U. S. 302.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Brooks v. Missouri, 124 U. S. 394, 400; John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Nevada-California-Oregon Ry. v. Burres, 244 U. S. 103, 105; Central Union Co. v. Edwardsville, 269 U. S. 190, 195; Kammerer v. Kroeger, 299 U. S. 302.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 U.S. 655, 58 S. Ct. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-rogers-scotus-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack