Barnett v. Rogers

Supreme Court

Barnett v. Rogers

302 U.S. 655, 58 S. Ct. 363

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 13, 1937·No. No. 569·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Brooks v. Missouri, 124 U. S. 394, 400; John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Nevada-California-Oregon Ry. v. Burres, 244 U. S. 103, 105; Central Union Co. v. Edwardsville, 269 U. S. 190, 195; Kammerer v. Kroeger, 299 U. S. 302.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Brooks v. Missouri, 124 U. S. 394, 400; John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Nevada-California-Oregon Ry. v. Burres, 244 U. S. 103, 105; Central Union Co. v. Edwardsville, 269 U. S. 190, 195; Kammerer v. Kroeger, 299 U. S. 302.

Barnett v. Rogers, 302 U.S. 655, 58 S. Ct. 363 (1937).

Pincite

302 U.S. 655 (Barnett v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related